Productivity of young sheep of the southern meat breed and using a new type created Katum sheep
https://doi.org/10.26897/2074-0840-2026-2-15-19
Abstract
Feeding rations and nutrient digestibility in purebred and crossbred lambs of the southern meat breed are shown, as well as the dynamics of body weight from 3 to 8 months of age and the results of the animals’ control slaughter. The digestibility of feed nutrients was highest in the crossbred lambs of group 4, with 7/8 blood of the Katum breed. The difference in the digestibility of organic matter and crude protein between animals of groups 1 and 4 was 5.49 and 5.67 absolute percent, respectively. For dry matter and crude fiber, the difference was 5.47 and 4.96 absolute percent, and it is highly significant. A significant increase in daily gains was observed in crossbred lambs of different bloodlines from katumskaya rams (from 223 to 245- 267 g) and a reduction in feed costs per 1 kg of body weight gain. The results of the control slaughter showed that the difference in pre-slaughter weight between purebred and crossbred animals was 5.7; 8.4; 11.5 kg or 10.4; 15.3; and 20.9%. For the weight of the carcass, the difference between the groups of rams was 3.72; 5.52; and 7.97 kg or 13.2; 19.5; and 28.2%, with a significant and highly significant difference.
About the Authors
V. G. DvalishviliRussian Federation
VladimirG. Dvalishvili, Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, Professor
142132, Podolsk, Moscow region, Dubrovitsy village, 60
O. E. Sidash
Russian Federation
Oksana E. Sidash, animal breeding specialist
142132, Podolsk, Moscow region, Dubrovitsy village, 60
References
1. Trukhachev V.I., Selionova M.I., Krivoruchko A.Yu., Aibazov A.M.M. Genetic markers of meat productivity in sheep (Ovis aries l.). Report I. Myostatin, calpain, calpastatin ● Agricultural Biology. 2018. Vol. 53, No. 6. Pp. 1107-1119. doi: 10.15389 /agrobiology. 2018.6.1107rus.
2. Aboneev V.V., Aboneeva E.V. Some ways of preserving and improving breeding resources in domestic production ● Sheep, goats, wool business, 2022. N. 3. Рp. 3-6.
3. Kulikova A.Y. Creation of a breeding base for meat and beef sheep breeding ● Sheep, goats, woolen business, 2022. N.3. Рр.9-12.
4. Dvalishvili V.G. Evaluation of meat productivity of Romanov and Kuibyshev sheep and their crosses with Ile de France rams ● Sheep, goats, wool business, 2023. N3. Pр. 31-35.
5. Erokhin A.I., Kotarev V.I., S.A. Erokhin, Yuldashbaev Yu.A. Sheep breeding ● Moscow: MESKH, 2024. 510 р.
6. Lushnikov V.P., Alenin P.G., Vasiliev A.A. The state of breeding resources of the Tsigai sheep breed of the Russian Federation ● Sheep, goats, wool business, 2024. No. 4. Рp. 20-24.
7. Dmitrieva T.O. Meat breed sheep-katumskaya ● Agrarian science, 2018. № 6. Рр. 25-27.
8. Popova Y. Ivanov N., Slavova P. et al. Efficiency of fattening lambs from Bulgarian dairy synthetic population and its F1 crosses with meat sheep breeds ● Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 25 (Suppl. 1) 2019. Pр. 78-81.
9. Laleva S., Slavova P., Ivanova T. et al. Phenotypic characteristics of breeding traits in Ile de France sheep ● Животновъдни Науки, 2020. Т. 57. N3. Рр. 23-30.
10. Yearbook on Breeding Work in Sheep and Goat Husbandry in the Farm Enterprises of the Russian Federation (2023) ● Moscow, VNIIPlem, 2025. 334 p.
11. Dvalishvili V.G., Osadchaya T.L. Killing and meat qualities of purebred and crossbred Ile de France lambs of the southern meat breed ● Achievements of Science and Technology in Agro-Industrial Complex, 2025. Vol. 39. No. 2. Pр. 69-73. doi: 10.53859/02352451_2025_39_2_69.
12. Shchugoreva T.E., Gagloev A.Ch., Kozaev I.S., Akimov A.B. Influence of genotype on the quality of mutton ● Bulletin of Michurinsk State Agrarian University, 2025. No. 2 (81). Pр. 77-81.
Review
For citations:
Dvalishvili V.G., Sidash O.E. Productivity of young sheep of the southern meat breed and using a new type created Katum sheep. Sheep, goats, wool business. 2026;(2):15-19. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26897/2074-0840-2026-2-15-19
JATS XML











